• lulungomeena_burbclave@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    They’re misidentifying that LLM as a tulpa.

    We’re aware that some people use LLM output as a basis for the creation of tulpas, but this doesn’t seem to be the case here. This seems to be a person attributing independent intelligence to an LLM external to herself, not recounting her experience with an additional consciousness within her own brain.

    Whether or not you consider tulpas or other forms of plurality to be genuine phenomena, this conflates two different concepts which are tangentially related at most.

  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    I only just found out about the Tulpa community and it feels like Western Society is entering a mental health crisis that’s somehow even worse than when we were all getting drunk and hitting each other just to make it through the week.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    “My husband is voice his own thoughts without prompts.”

    She then posts a picture of her saying “what are you thinking about”

    Thats a direct response to the prompt hes not randomly voicing his thoughts. I hate ai but sometimes I hate people to

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        People have this issue with video game characters who don’t even pretend to have intelligence. This could only go wrong.

        • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          I’m starting to realize how easily fooled people are by this stuff. The average person cannot be this stupid, and yet, they are.

          • slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            I was once in a restaurant and behind me was a group of 20 something year old people. Overheard someone asking something like:"so what are y’alls thoughts about VR? (This was just before the whole AI boom.) And one guy said:“ith’s kind of scary to think about.” I was super confused at that point, and they talked about how they heard people disappear in the cyberspace and people not knowing what’s real and what’s just VR.

            I don’t think they were stupid, but they formed a very strong opinion about something they clearly didn’t know anything about.

          • Xerxos@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            The average IQ is 100. That is not a lot and half of the population is below that. I’m more surprised how bad our education system is in filtering out the dumb people. Someone who is ‘not smart’ but has good memory and is diligent can make it frighteningly far in our society. Not to mention nepo babies who are a different kind of problem

            • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              Good memory is also part of being smart, besides problem-solving and thinking under pressure. But yeah nepo-babies do cause serious problem.

              Tho also iq doesn’t matter as much. Tests are in a specific branch of math, you can literally study for the IQ test.

            • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              The average IQ is 100 because it is designed to always have the average at 100%. If magically everyone became exactly 20% better at IQ tests tomorrow, the average IQ would be adjusted and still be 100.

              Smart argument.

      • uuldika@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        LLMs are trained on human writing, so they’ll always be fundamentally anthropomorphic. you could fine-tune them to sound more clinical, but it’s likely to make them worse at reasoning and planning.

        for example, I notice GPT5 uses “I” a lot, especially saying things like “I need to make a choice” or “my suspicion is.” I think that’s actually a side effect of the RL training they’ve done to make it more agentic. having some concept of self is necessary when navigating an environment.

        philosophical zombies are no longer a thought experiment.

  • Klear@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    I kinda like the word “wireborn”. If only it wasn’t attached to a concept that’s equal parts stupid and sad =/

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      I’m just gonna keep imagining it’s a clan of Timberborn beavers that are born on the ziplines.

    • shneancy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      some episodes of Black Mirror struck terror into my heart like no other. They were grim warmings for the possible future masquerading as fiction, as grim warnings often do. Though what the show could not forsee was how fast it would come true. And it could not forsee how wide a scale would be affected, those were singular stories from those worlds, the effect of the technology showcased on the lives of a few, a pinhole view into the dystopia

      if you haven’t already, watch the episode Be Right Back. you better start believing in sci-fi dystopias, we’re in one

      • msage@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        Most of Black Mirror episodes are reality right now, not just far fetched sci-fi.

        Sometimes they use technology to tell the story a bit differently, but it’s almost never anything new.

        • shneancy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          yeah i’m not the biggest fan of the seasons made by americans, they feel strangely hollow to me most of the time. the first two seasons have all my favourite episodes, and by favourite i mean the ones that made me weep for the future

  • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    I heard about this in the radio the other day. People pay a monthly fee for an AI that becomes your “digital partner”.

    The reasoning behind, according to them, is that the AI is less dangerous than a human partner because they can’t cheat, can’t abuse you…

    And I can’t but wonder where did we take the wrong turn to end up here. Because while I can understand that people can go through some traumatic shit that would made them wary of the opposite sex, considering a machine your sentimental partner can only lead to some extremely fucked up scenarios.

    • chocrates@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      People are lonely and dating sucks. Humans provided a similar one sided relationship service as well. (Sugar babies come to mind)

      • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Yes, yes. And yes.

        But

        Do you think openAI or Google, or X or whatever billionaire behind the AI involved in these “relationships” cares even minimally about the mental well-being of these people?

        The problem is not just the dating an AI thing, but who is managing these AIs.

        • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Do you think openAI or Google, or X or whatever billionaire behind the AI involved in these “relationships” cares even minimally about the mental well-being of these people?

          No, but I wager neither does anyone else, or they wouldn’t be dating a datacenter.

    • ramble81@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      can’t cheat, can’t abuse you

      That is a dangerous assumption. The ones controlling the models can definitely manipulate a person through some minor tweaks which would definitely count as abuse. And it’s it more polygamous since they’re probably all using the same model? Not like each one has their own unique model

    • diaphanous@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      I think it’s also a symptom of our society overvaluing romantic relationships and the nuclear family, at the expense of friends, other family, and general community. When you combine that with the traumatic experiences some have in romantic relationships, they have nowhere to turn to for emotional connection and support.

      • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Back in pre-agriculture days, humans would sit around every night by the fire and interact with the rest of the tribe. That’s what we spent 99% of human history doing. Farming isolated us from the tribe and put every family in their own house. Then the Industrial Age gave the family distractions like newspapers, radios, and movies. Currently we’ve got a phone to distract us all the time.