Copying this from Reddit (I still get the daily emails). Since I no longer post there, I figured I would ask here, and include my prediction: Will be more popular, possibly in stable release. Still won’t be able to rotate photos natively.

  • roofuskit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Just out of curiosity, what’s the use case for having all your photos actually on the phone as opposed to remote access from your phone?

    • conrad82@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Backup, redundancy, easy access… If my server goes down I don’t have the time to fix it at the moment.

      Also the photos app on my phone is quite good, so I find it very easy to find old pictures quickly.

      I also prefer offline-capable solutions

    • thatonecoder@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      If the internet disappears or you lose access to it for some reason, you can still see your photos.

      • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        You can survive a day trip without access to your photos. We managed just fine before smartphones brought that practice into the mainstream.

          • roofuskit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            That would be an insane amount of phone storage. I don’t think a single available smart phone could sync an entire professional library of photos. Especially considering how large each photo is.

          • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            A professional photographer doesn’t use cloud storage to store the GBs of RAW files from their shoots

            • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Why not? They absolutely should be using something like Backblaze. In fact someone who has digital photos as their business would be dumb not to use cloud storage.

              • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                14 hours ago

                You’re not uploading to Backblaze as you shoot photos. You’re dumping the SD cards, or saving RAW files directly, onto a fileserver or computer of some sort.

                Nobody in their right mind would use Immich or GPhotos for that kind of thing, which is what this chain was about. Backblaze is a completely different scenario, for backing up data after the fact.