fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 23 hours agoReal Talkmander.xyzimagemessage-square29linkfedilinkarrow-up1450arrow-down10
arrow-up1450arrow-down1imageReal Talkmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 23 hours agomessage-square29linkfedilink
minus-squareMicrow@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27·18 hours agoWorst case scenario: The peer reviewer is Gabor.
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·17 hours agoBest Case Scenario: Gabor agrees the paper was crap
minus-squareMaturin [any]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·15 hours agoYour comment combined with Zote’s made for an excellent synthesis.
minus-squareZoteTheMighty@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·16 hours agoIf your reviewer suggests you cite another paper, it’s one of their papers and they just doxed themselves, 100% of the time.
Worst case scenario:
The peer reviewer is Gabor.
Best Case Scenario:
Gabor agrees the paper was crap
Your comment combined with Zote’s made for an excellent synthesis.
If your reviewer suggests you cite another paper, it’s one of their papers and they just doxed themselves, 100% of the time.