I’d say probably no, he clearly got so distracted by all that shit that he forgot to let her finish

yeah but that’s not part of the original comment, not even by implication. the opposite is also not true so it doesn’t factor in at all. even though you’re not claiming it would be an improvement the original post clearly does and that’s what the top level comment is countering.

disagree. again, we don’t even know if such a change would be beneficial.

also, more importantly, the post is entirely stupid.

suboptimal by what measure? became disadvantageous how? against what? last time i checked ve**rtebrates were still dominating. now even more than they did during the ages of dinosaurs.

evolution was too late to correct it… what? first of all, is it even a mistake to correct? where’s the evidence of that? second of all, did evolution stop? too late how? it’s complete bullshit, and if anything the original comment wasn’t harsh enough on it.

no they’re not. by definition if you don’t have what you need you don’t survive. we definitively don’t need it. or at least haven’t for millions of years. that’s different from saying we wouldn’t benefit from it.

although that’s not a guarantee either. more information isn’t always better.

nice. though valid but obsolete is not a thing… if it’s obsolete it’s invalid.

deleted by creator