• mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      This is PURE speculation, but I feel like this could be caused by the only people who feel comfortable getting a philosophy degree being wealthy connected people. I know a lot of people from my high school that have stereotypical “be poor forever” degrees and are doing great - but if you knew them in high school, you’d know that they had millionaire parents. All the poor kids went for safer degrees because they knew they’d need money.

      To be clear: I love philosophy and think it is very valuable. But sadly it seems like something that only privileged people or the very passionate take a risk on.

    • tux7350@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Don’t ya think this might be a bit bias? They have a vested interest to sell you a philosophy degree.

      • eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I used my philosophy of science classwork all the time in my engineering career.

        What constitutes proof? What kinds of questions can you answer with data? When do we consider a pattern of behavior to represent the existence of some entity?

        Being able to think about these kinds of questions with clarity is really helpful in diagnosing problems in large systems.

        • Corngood@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          What constitutes proof? What kinds of questions can you answer with data? When do we consider a pattern of behavior to represent the existence of some entity?

          Any recommended reading for someone who’s never formally studied philosophy?

          • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            39 minutes ago

            Karl Popper, “The Logic of Scientific Discovery” is a seminal work in the modern philosophy of science. It proposes to solve the problem of induction, and his proposal of falsifiability is, to my knowledge, the most popular philosophical framework for modern scientific practice. I’d be interested in what the above commenter has to say about Popper, though, as I am not well-read outside of his work, as my focus is on the history of science.

        • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I’ve worked with a few philosophy majors in various roles and they were more thoughtful about things. Like they learned how to think, not just what to think.

      • dandelion (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        yes, though the facts and studies they link to remain true regardless - this is the strongest argument for getting a philosophy degree, it makes sense they present it