fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 days agoFlashbang!mander.xyzimagemessage-square36linkfedilinkarrow-up1789arrow-down13
arrow-up1786arrow-down1imageFlashbang!mander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square36linkfedilink
minus-squareWakmrow [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 days agoWhy don’t scientists just use nods
minus-squareCethin@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 days agoThat’s still amplifying light that is there. In total blackness they still don’t work. In very low light they generate a lot of visual noise. You’d need to provide some kind of light source for this no matter what.
Why don’t scientists just use nods
That’s still amplifying light that is there. In total blackness they still don’t work. In very low light they generate a lot of visual noise. You’d need to provide some kind of light source for this no matter what.