# Preamble
By ancient rites, this code is bound,
No mortal hand may twist it 'round.
# Terms of Use
Permission granted: to mend and make,
To copy, share, for spirit's sake.
Yet mark: no coin, no profit gained,
Shall taint this magic, unrestrained.
# Disclaimer
Provided "as is," without a truth,
No crone will blame, if ill, forsooth.
# Enforcement
The pact by moonlight, strongly spun,
Binds souls if greed hath now been won.
# Cost
The threads are spun, the spell complete,
No greed, lest curses, you shall meet.
Good license though I might need to consult a witch instead of a lawyer for an exact interpretation.
I’m gonna use it on something harmless, like the code that opens a gate located on Mars.
You can’t just shoot a hole into the surface of Mars
Objective updated: shoot a hole into Mars
It’s funny, but… no, it’s not a good license.
Can you elaborate, please?
It’s really vague, it doesn’t define its terms, and despite all of that it somehow still manages to be self-contradictory which is frankly impressive.
The GNU licenses are written in the way they are because they were written with long legal counsel and analyzing actual law.
A text like this, other than the no commercial bullshit which may do more harm than any good, is not good legal text and leaves too much to interpretation. Also using a rhyme as a license may be rejected by some certain courts.
Very good meme license, but please for the love of god never use it for any project of yours
Non-commercial usage restriction makes this license not FOSS compatible.
Additionally, ‘no mortal hand’ restriction is strange, it permits someone like medusa to modify the code while forbidding that to actual software engineers, and would a software engineer dictating code to a medusa be a breach of this clause? I’m not saying that long-lived organisms cannot obtain programming skills, but it is exceedingly rare.What’s the difference between twisting the code around (which is forbidden) and mending it (which is allowed)?
That is talking about the license, it’s saying you can’t relicense a derivative.
Changing the original intent versus submitting patches?
I love this. Thanks.
